On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:25:51 GMT
Paul Donnelly <paul-donne...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> jason.cat...@gmail.com (Jason Catena) writes:
> 
> > I've been wondering for years now why Acme (and Wily, which I used
> > first) only display text files.
> >
> > It seems to me that the content of an Acme window could be anything: a
> > picture, a postscript or PDF file, a star chart, a web page.  Keeping
> > with the spirit of small parts brought together, Acme could outsource
> > the displaying of the content to another program, place its output in
> > the Acme window, and operate on it by sending commands from the tag to
> > the rendering program.
> 
> Hi, I don't know anything about anything, but it seems to me that it's
> more productive to look at the question the other way around: why not
> modify Rio to tile windows like Acme does? Acme is a text editor, so
> it's no surprise that it handles text only.

You may be thinking too monolithically. The draw device multiplexes itself so 
it shouldn't take much coding for acme to provide draw in addition to the other 
files it provides in /mnt/wsys.

Mouse is just as important as draw and will need a little more code. Not only 
would acme need to multiplex it but it would need to emulate rio's behaviour. 
To quote Rio's man page: "Opening it turns off scrolling, editing, and 
rio-supplied menus in the associated window." That isn't 100% true, scrolling 
isn't actually disabled but is not naturally accessible and looks very messy 
when you force it. What is true is that rio ceases to interpret keys specially 
other than backspace and return (curiously), and mouse events on the window are 
blindly sent to the application.

It still doesn't sound like a lot of code, but may take some careful thought. 
Maybe that's a summary of Plan 9 methodology. :)

I also take issue with the statement "Acme is a text editor," that never sounds 
right, no more than describing Emacs as a text editor. It's natural to use Acme 
as a text editor and it provides many more text-editing facilities than Rio 
does, but it is also natural to use it as a file manager, shell window 
provider, email client, etc, etc. It provides more than Rio and it does it all 
with tiling windows and without menus, but that's just style. Rio windows could 
seriously use a search function and one or two other text-editor facilities 
wouldn't go amiss. It doesn't seem natural to me that Acme does not allow 
graphical programs in it's windows.

-- 
Ethan Grammatikidis

Those who are slower at parsing information must
necessarily be faster at problem-solving.

Reply via email to