>>Considering that Plan 9 has only two inherent languages,
>>and its users often push for work to be done in only those,
>>what is the Plan 9 perspective of languages and tools in
>>relation to each other?
>>Is it in agreement with this statement?
>
> It's certainly true that cultures and mindsets build up
> around different things, some of it reasonable, some of it not,
> and I observe Plan 9 is not much different in this regard.
> That said, saying "push" and "inherent" are probably
> inherently pushing things :)

I suppose my wording showed emphasis in all the wrong places.
The question I meant to ask was (given the context of the
referenced article):
  In the Plan 9 environment, are languages considered to be "tools"?

The rest was just my reasoning to ask.


Best,
ak

Reply via email to