On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@coraid.com> wrote:
> size isn't the real issue. the real issue is determining what
> the ranges are for other than the base character. if a maps
> to [aa'...] and z maps to [zz'...] it's not clear that [a'-z'] is a
> sensible set. for example what does [e-f] map to? [e-f], clearly
> but [ë-what?]
>
``unfold turns a character, say ë into the set of
characters that can be folded to the same base
character. so
; unfold ë
[eèéêëēĕėęěȅȇȩḕḗḙḛḝẹẻẽếềểễệ]''
To me, that sounds like [e-f] should be
[eèéêëēĕėęěȅȇȩḕḗḙḛḝẹẻẽếềểễệfƒ]
iff e unfolds to the same set as ë. If e only unfolds to [e], then
[e-f] would unfold to [ef].
Does that sound sane?
