On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:02 PM, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote: > No! I'm glad that it is open source. I would not have even given it a > second > glance if it was not. If Linus had access to Plan 9 as a base I think > things > could have looked very different now, and possibly for the better. >
I don't think that's true... he's been on this list, and he's had his say about how he thinks about the way things work in Plan 9. http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1233 http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1229 http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1227 http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1225 http://9fans.net/archive/2004/02/1224 Dave > > > > I don't get your reasoning. Do you want to say we would be better off > > if they had not released it?! > > > > On 3/21/10, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote: > > > > > >> no, it's just badly designed. Working with a bad design gives me a > > >> splitting headache. I make my living doing linux but that doesn't mean > > >> I have to worship at the altar, right? > > > > > > To bad plan 9 was publicly released just after Linus started working on > > > Linux. > > > Oh well. It's all about timing. > >
