On 23 April 2010 00:04, roger peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > another way (and how i would usually do it): > > ,x g/0\.00/i/\n/ >
Oh yes, that's probably the best.+- is really unnecessary in this case. Thanks R
On 23 April 2010 00:04, roger peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > another way (and how i would usually do it): > > ,x g/0\.00/i/\n/ >
Oh yes, that's probably the best.+- is really unnecessary in this case. Thanks R