On Wed Apr 28 13:58:40 EDT 2010, news...@lava.net wrote:
> > I admit I am surprised by how much a difference there is, it should
> > be just Tread and Rread headers shouldn't it?
> 
> If you have high latency or high bandwidth, the maximum message
> size for the 9p messages will be too small to keep the pipe full
> if you're using read serially. Did you take a look at how much
> bandwith was actually in use during your tests?

unless you've got some sort of interrupt or cpu bottleneck,
i don't see what message size has to do with this issue.  the
real issue is the # of messages outstanding.

- erik

Reply via email to