> > Thanks Erik, Sape, and
> Skip.  That was such a STUPID error, and I thank
> > you all for the extra eyes.  I think it is time
> for a break and a bowl of
> > tea...
> 
> relax.  not stupid, subtle.  it takes vigilance
> to keep
> sizeof, nelem, strlen, and the number of characters
> straight.

This is part of why I often recommend (and generally
do myself) that sizeof only be used on types, not
variables:

Foo bar;

use sizeof(Foo) rather than sizeof(bar).  It does
require slightly more work for arrays:

Foo bar[NFOO];

requires NFOO * sizeof(Foo) rather than sizeof(bar),
but I personally think it's worth it to keep the
distinction between sizeof and strlen straight.

BLS


Reply via email to