On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Tristan Plumb <9p...@imu.li> wrote: >>> multiple inputs or outputs? if so, my first pass would be do something >>> like what #l does: #l0, #l1, &c. >> Wouldn't it be better to use #A0, #A1, ... for the case of multiple >> audio devices instead of multiple in/outs in one device? > that would make sense to me, though if there's a ethernet card that had > multiple interfaces in an analogous way, #l0, #l1 would probably be used. > >> I don't see why control^(1 2 3 4 5 6) or in1, out1 are so ugly >> (specially considering that this is just a potential "problem"). > the cs42l51 (the codec used on the openrd) audioctl looks like this: >
I am guessing the io in audio does not mean in/out. I think audioinctl audiooutctl is a little bit more readable. At least do audinctl audoutctl if you are shooting for shortness. -- - curiosity sKilled the cat
