> Yes, this is the type of explicit-ness I was thinking of. Note that > you can now drop further tests for up == 0 later in the qlock() text.
Hm, spoke too quickly. The tests on "up" have to remain, sadly. Sorry about the misleading noise. ++L
> Yes, this is the type of explicit-ness I was thinking of. Note that > you can now drop further tests for up == 0 later in the qlock() text.
Hm, spoke too quickly. The tests on "up" have to remain, sadly. Sorry about the misleading noise. ++L