my hg-fu isn't very good; i'm not sure if this is the right way of
applying the patch. using patch, one operation fails (it looks like
the copy isn't done)
f...@hpamd:~/go$ patch -p1 < ../issue3816043_9001.diff
patching file src/pkg/os/Makefile
patching file src/pkg/os/dir_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/env_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/error.go
patching file src/pkg/os/error_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/error_posix.go
patching file src/pkg/os/exec.go
patching file src/pkg/os/exec.go
Hunk #1 FAILED at 146.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/pkg/os/exec.go.rej
patching file src/pkg/os/file.go
patching file src/pkg/os/file_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/file_posix.go
patching file src/pkg/os/proc.go
patching file src/pkg/os/stat_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/sys_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/os/time.go
patching file src/pkg/runtime/plan9/386/rt0.s
patching file src/pkg/syscall/Makefile
patching file src/pkg/syscall/asm_plan9_386.s
patching file src/pkg/syscall/mkall.sh
patching file src/pkg/syscall/mksyscall_plan9.awk
patching file src/pkg/syscall/mksyscall_plan9.sh
patching file src/pkg/syscall/mksysnum_plan9.sh
patching file src/pkg/syscall/syscall.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/syscall_plan9.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/syscall_plan9_386.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/syscall_unix.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/types_plan9.c
patching file src/pkg/syscall/zerrors_plan9_386.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_plan9_386.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/zsysnum_plan9_386.go
patching file src/pkg/syscall/ztypes_plan9_386.go
at any rate building on linux targeting plan9 and 386 arch (some tests
fail), i can generate an output. running it on plan9 causes a
protection violation:
cpue% pwd
/mnt/term/home/fst/test
cpue% cat hell-o.go
package main
func main() {
println("Hello, 世界")
}
cpue% ./8.hell-o
8.hell-o 19698: suicide: sys: trap: general protection violation pc=0x00007047
-Skip
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Pavel Zholkover <paulz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've pushed syscall and os package support for Plan 9 on x86 at
> http://codereview.appspot.com/3816043/ (pending a review).
> I had to make changes to the core go files, so keep your fingers
> crossed I didn't break anything along the way and get committed.
>
> If you have access to a real Plan 9 machine or inside qemu) please
> test (9vx does not seem to work, confirmed by Andrey Mirtchovski for
> early versions of code).
>
> (Reminder: -s needs to be passed to 8l, otherwise the binaries fail to run).
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
>
