Hi Noah,

I pinged you offline. Not sure if you got my
messages.

It seems that your fan-in operator creates
the pipes, then they're passed along to the
ORF and IRF through argv (via the fan-out
and fan-in respectively). I've checked that
indeed the pipes are being created, by
running push -r ... and subsequently
checking /fd to make sure the corresp.
file descriptors are there. And the '-r'
flag even tells me:
...
Xsimple (../fdcat ) (13 9 5 )
...
Xsimple (echo ) (14 10 6 )
...

and yet, my IRF and ORF programs
don't receive any arguments - the argv
list is empty for both. Any ideas why
this could be?


Thanks,
ak


On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Noah Evans <noah.ev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You need filters and the filters need to be set up by default in
> rcmain. Anthony is on top of things as usual :) It would be nice to
> have other users and if you are interested in exercising it ping me
> offlist.
>
> Noah
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Akshat Kumar
> <aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
>> Is "broken!" the default prompt, or am I
>> seeing some error here? A primitive
>> grep of the source files didn't reveal
>> any instance of that string, so I wonder...
>> Also because:
>>
>> broken! echo hello |< cat >| cat
>> rc (push): empty argument list
>> rc (push): empty argument list
>> term%
>>
>> Perhaps I should try the test/ dir first...
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ak
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <eri...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Akshat Kumar
>>> <aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
>>>> Yes, I've seen this. This is the port to Plan 9 Ports.
>>>> I would like the code for Plan 9. I imagine reproducing
>>>> will make things uglier than the original.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Jacob Todd <jaketodd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/push/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://bitbucket.org/ericvh/hare/src/3b24a40eb3d1/sys/src/cmd/push/
>>>
>>> may be partial, development is ongoing - bug noah.
>>>
>>>       -eric
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to