> i did read it before asking, and i'm still wondering why
> not mux tcp instead (provided you dont want/need that extra feature
> or dont implement it that way)
> 
> 
> On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Russ Cox <r...@swtch.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Nemo <nemo.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> why not mux tcp instead?
>> 
>> See the paper.  Among other things, independent flow control
>> on the different sub-streams.
>> 
>> http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/sst-abs.html

Reply via email to