> i did read it before asking, and i'm still wondering why > not mux tcp instead (provided you dont want/need that extra feature > or dont implement it that way) > > > On Feb 20, 2011, at 10:59 PM, Russ Cox <r...@swtch.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Nemo <nemo.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> why not mux tcp instead? >> >> See the paper. Among other things, independent flow control >> on the different sub-streams. >> >> http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/sst-abs.html
- [9fans] streams Charles Forsyth
- Re: [9fans] streams Nemo
- Re: [9fans] streams erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] streams Russ Cox
- Re: [9fans] streams Nemo
- Re: [9fans] streams Nemo
- Re: [9fans] streams Mechiel Lukkien
- Re: [9fans] streams roger peppe
- Re: [9fans] streams erik quanstrom
- Re: [9fans] streams roger peppe
- Re: [9fans] streams Bakul Shah