* Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I believe that a Plan9 target for a cross compiler might > be more interesting. GCC already added support for the Plan9 dialect > of C. If it also could be made to compile Plan9 binaries, it could be > used for an alternative self-hosting distro as the one you envisaged.
ACK. If, lets say, crosstool-NG could produce an GCC-alike (not necessarily GCC itself, but supporting the same command line interfaces) cross-toolchain for native Plan9 and p9p, that would be a *big* help. Perhaps even extend the autohell to support it. On the other hand, we could also port plan9's make to GNU natively. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weig...@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------
