Yep, with 3.1 9vx runs fine for an hour already. However, I want to try installing Plan 9 natively. Tomorrow. Btw, why there are 9atom and 9front? I mean, why they aren't joined together? What the difference between them?
2011/11/22 Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> > i'll modify what i said to "... suspect the host os first". it's been > my experience that every autoupdate on Ubuntu and Windows brings in > its share of new bugs (hopefully less than the number of bugs it > fixes) > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> > wrote: > > On Mon Nov 21 15:20:58 EST 2011, skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com wrote: > >> i run 9vx occasionally. a while back i built 9vx from ron's > >> repository. i was having problems with it under Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, > >> where sometimes both cores were pegged at 100%; it was a problem with > >> linux (judging by ubuntu mailing lists). without changing 9vx, things > >> got stable after 10.10 (currently on 11.10). so, when in doubt, > >> suspect the host os. > > > > !? the fact that one bug was found in linux doesn't imply that bugs are > likely > > in any host os. the oses are better tested than 9vx, so given no other > information > > i would conclude the opposite; 9vx is more likely at fault. and > regardless, we > > have little chance of fixing the os. > > > > - erik > > > > > >
