On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:21 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> >> Now gs builds (untested) on/for arm. > > gs already built/works on arm. did someone break it? > it is too slow to use, though. does anyone know what's > wrong with gs on amd64?
not sure, but it as also failing to build for 386 even with a recent pull. -jas
