On Wed Mar 14 14:03:34 EDT 2012, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote: > > >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation. > > > > > > ... > > > > Let's not take this one completely off the table yet. SSHv2 > > would be extremely useful in helping open up communication > > with external systems again. > > As Erik said, there is a substantial effort here, probably > more than we could expect of a student during a summer. > However, I can now say that the effort has been made, and > something more of an announcement will be forthcoming. > It'll probably be at least a few days, but a native SSHv2 > implementation does exist. > > > I use to find sshnet extremely > > viable in a mixed network where now I'm just using sshv2 to > > tunnel in overly complicated startup scripts. > > There's not a direct replacement for sshnet per se in this > implementation, but here ssh becomes a protocol sitting in > /net. So it should be pretty easy to tunnel just about > anything, and I suspect that the changes needed to sshnet > would be relatively minor and would cut out all the SSH > protocol bits.
boo-ya! - erik
