> Loading a kernel mode binary doesn't require a WHQL cross-signature,
> but WHQL will disable some yellow warnings otherwise shown to the
> user. WHQL is very expensive, depends on the type of driver, for what
> I was doing it was in the order of $2k/test. Every new version of the
> binary required a new test. Other types of drivers are cheaper or more
> expensive, we never bothered with WHQL, it was too expensive for us.
> There was no WHQL option for file system and I believe that stands
> true today as well.

i have no explaination for the differences you see, but this is even more
pointless than a bike shed argument.  since in the end, the ms machinery
painted the shed whatever color it wanted and now even it itself is locked in 
for
eternity.  :-)

- erik

Reply via email to