No, see the call to procansw On 22 August 2012 10:22, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
> since, if qp->curdest is an end pointer, then p!=qp->curdest ≡ 1.
No, see the call to procansw On 22 August 2012 10:22, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
> since, if qp->curdest is an end pointer, then p!=qp->curdest ≡ 1.