Pavel Klinkovsky <pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com> once said: > I made another test. > I compared compilation of exp/locale/collate of the Go build 14738 and > 14739 (and later). > > Compilation of 14738 does not consume RAM a lot. > Compilation of 14739 (and later) consume a huge amount of RAM > (involving swap). > > So it seems the Plan 9 has a problem with the virtual memory > management (when using swap), IMO.
How much memory does your system have? Changeset 14739 grew the Unicode collation tables in the exp/locale/collate package by a considerable amount. The compiler's memory usage now goes above 400 MB when building that package, almost 2.5x the amount used to compile the second heavyweight and 15x the average. Anthony
