> The C compilers in the Go toolchain pass everything on the
> stack and return the result in a register.
> 
> The Go compilers pass everything on the stack including the
> output parameters. No registers are involved in the calling
> convention.

That isn't a big deal, in my case, because the language handled by the
C compilers in the Go toolchain is the same as Plan 9 native C, so,
within reason, I would expect the Go toolchain to compile the OpenLDAP
programs successfully, it doesn't matter if they are not consistent
with the Plan 9 native toolchain.

I suppose this raises the first concrete question: how do I get the
"go" tool to compile the OpenLDAP libraries (and possibly programs) in
some sensible fashion?  It would be distressing to have to increase
the autoconf hell at this point.  A partial answer to this would be
preferable to a blunt "You should not be wanting to do this".

Again, thanks for the contributions, the fog isn't visibly lifting
yet, but the feeling's there :-)

++L

PS: Note that even corrections of crossed wires have been extremely
helpful.

PPS: Eventually, there needs to be ONE Go + C + ASM toolchain.  It may
take years and a lot of TLC to produce, but any other outcome, with
the possible exception that something will obsolete each of the above
languages, is a frightening prospect in the long term.  Let's keep
that in mind and not contribute intentionally and unnecessarily to the
divergence.


Reply via email to