There are, regularly, mention for "porting" or having gcc(1) on Plan9 in order to be able to port more user level applications (because user level applications not only depend on a bunch of things---generally ignoring standards---but on compiler idiosynchrasies too...).
With gcc 4.8.0, the implementation of gcc is now in C++... And to compile a compiler, one needs a C++ compiler... Great! I always thought that, because of what can be embedded in a compiler (cf. Ken Thompson's Trusting Trust) and because of a bootstrapping process (as explained in the red dragon book for example), the compiling of a compiler should need the strict minimum... IMHO, with the advent of a crisis compared to which 1929 will be a minor storm, there will be a general disgust and lack of trust and a return for crucial things to small is beautiful (and safer). Plan9 is not dead, simply waiting its "finest hour". Gcc on Plan9 is. And I won't weep. -- Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com> http://www.kergis.com/ Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C