On Mon Dec 2 15:44:27 EST 2013, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote: > On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:38:21 EST erik quanstrom <quans...@labs.coraid.com> > wrote: > > On Mon Dec 2 15:25:33 EST 2013, 0in...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > python on plan9 can't even handle the codereview extension. > > > > > > > > i believe that's false. jas' port does a lot of things the > > > > prior port does not. it's on bitbucket. > > > > > > I agree with Erik. Jeff Sickel did a very good job on the > > > modern Python port. > > > > > > If you are afraid to compile it, I'm providing up-to-date > > > binaries (Python 2.7.5 and Mercurial 2.8.1) for Plan 9: > > > > it won't compile unless you're running 9atom. or have integrated > > the (extensive) changes to ape, especially in the sockets area. > > Another reason to break out ports. Ideally they should > work any plan9 fork.
i don't see how that follows. changes were needed to ape. the patches are sitting in /n/sources/patch. - erik
