thanks; i should have checked that. running it on the fossil+venti server brings it down a bit. still, it's not stellar.
bootes% go test PASS ok cmd/pack 81.480s bootes% go test PASS ok cmd/pack 79.719s On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Anthony Martin <al...@pbrane.org> wrote: > Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> once said: > > is anyone else seeing similar results for cmd/pack? > > > > % go test > > PASS > > ok cmd/pack 172.505s > > > > this is on an atom (d525 @ 1.8ghz, 4gb). same test on an arm (quad core > a9 > > @ 1.7ghz, 2gb, linux 3.8) takes much less time: > > > > % go test > > PASS > > ok cmd/pack 20.872s > > Your numbers don't look entirely abnormal. That test issues > over a million small writes. (Although it really should be > using bufio). > > How is your system set up? Are you getting your fs from > the network? The Plan 9 disk file systems are pretty slow > even when used locally. > > Anthony > >
