> For 386, Go barely works. For amd64, current Go doesn't currently work > on 9front (but works on Charles' kernel), probably due to a kernel > bug.
You got confused. It works (but there are still issues) on both 9front's and Charles' amd64 kernel, but not on 9front's 386 kernel (since November 2014). > Btw, Go broke on 9front about a year ago (or was it more than that?). > Only one single person noticed, and that was months later after the > fact. That serves as a useful test to gauge interest (and quality) in > Go on Plan 9. Another reason could be that most of 9front users use the amd64 kernel and not the 386 kernel. -- David du Colombier
