On 27 February 2017 at 15:46, Dave MacFarlane <driu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not skip sha-256 and go directly to Sha3? blake2 has also been suggested
On 27 February 2017 at 15:46, Dave MacFarlane <driu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not skip sha-256 and go directly to Sha3? blake2 has also been suggested