I don't think anyone is running it anymore. At least, I'm not running it. Sorry.
> El 8 mar 2018, a las 13:38, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.syk...@gmail.com> escribió: > >> On 3 March 2018 at 20:27, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: >> Octopus would run on Plan 9, although we used inferno for (hosted) terminals, >> and it used Op as the protocol (a descendant of 9p like everyone else), > > Ok. So does anybody use octopus these days? > Why not? (Who wouldn't like a ubiquitous environment?) > What do the authors of octopus use instead these days? (Clive seems > to me to serve a completely different purpose.) > > It seems the octopus environment uses a tile-like management > of its windows, unlike rio, where windows can overlap. > Has anybody done any experiments to arrive at a rio-like feel? > > How is it with the need for inferno? > (I tried to install octopus now on 9front. Unfortunately it asks me > too many questions I am, at this moment, unable to answer---I do > not understand them.) > > Thanks > Ruda >
