why do you use the past tense about glendix? is it finished? On 10/2/18, Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> wrote: > maybe this is what you meant, but the glendix project was this - > approximately. > > Steve > >> On 2 Oct 2018, at 6:22 pm, Bakul Shah <ba...@bitblocks.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 2, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Dave MacFarlane <driu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> see how far you can take the per process >>> namespaces of Linux >>> to make it feel like Plan 9. (AFAIK, that wouldn't be possible with >>> NetBSD or FreeBSD, but >>> I might be mistaken..) >> >> Adding per process namespaces to *BSD would be a nontrivial project. > > >
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kerne... Lucio De Re
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : k... Mayuresh Kathe
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : freeb... Roderick
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : freeb... Dave MacFarlane
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : ... Ethan Gardener
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : ... Bakul Shah
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kerne... Steve Simon
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : k... hiro
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system... Kurt H Maier
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : freeb... Aram Hăvărneanu
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kernel : ... Mayuresh Kathe
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kerne... Ethan Gardener
- Re: [9fans] plan9port : complete system : kerne... Bakul Shah