yes. bugs, on my side at least. The copy isolates from others. But some experiments in nix and in a thing I wrote for leanxcale show that some things can be much faster. It’s fun either way.
> El 13 oct 2018, a las 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> escribió: > > and, did it improve anything noticeably? > >> On 10/13/18, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I did several versions of one part of zero copy, inspired by several things >> in x-kernel, replacing Blocks by another structure throughout the network >> stacks and kernel, then made messages visible to user level. Nemo did >> another part, on his way to Clive >> >>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, 07:05 Ori Bernstein, <o...@eigenstate.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:43:00 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyn...@orthanc.ca> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Another case to ponder ... We're handling the incoming I/Q data >>>> stream, but need to fan that out to many downstream consumers. If >>>> we already read the data into a page, then flip it to the first >>>> consumer, is there a benefit to adding a reference counter to that >>>> read-only page and leaving the page live until the counter expires? >>>> >>>> Hiro clamours for benchmarks. I agree. Some basic searches I've >>>> done don't show anyone trying this out with P9 (and publishing >>>> their results). Anybody have hints/references to prior work? >>>> >>>> --lyndon >>>> >>> >>> I don't believe anyone has done the work yet. I'd be interested >>> to see what you come up with. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ori Bernstein >>> >>> >> >
