On 2018-11-30 10:10 AM, s...@9front.org wrote:
It's not clear why you think the interface provided by upasfs(4) is
captive, or why you insist acme needs to be involved at all. I'm
writing this message with nedmail/marshal, connected to Plan 9 in a
plain SSH terminal session -> OpenBSD -> drawterm -G. No GUI or
terminal frills or frippery is involved.
wow, i'll definitely check out nedmail/marshal.
btw, i don't think the interface provided by upasfs might be captive,
it's the mail/mailx interface which is so damn painful (from a usage
philosophy perspective).
~mayuresh
