I interpret it as: initialize it like a static variable.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:53 AM Kyohei Kadota <lu...@lufia.org> wrote:

> Thank you for a reply.
>
> I read spec on http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
> then I'm confusing.
> This spec describes Initialization:
>
> > 6.7.8 Initialization, p127
> >
> > 19 The initialization shall occur in initializer list order, each
> initializer provided for a
> > particular subobject overriding any previously listed initializer for
> the same subobject;132)
> > all subobjects that are not initialized explicitly shall be initialized
> implicitly the same as
> > objects that have static storage duration.
>
> What is "be initialized implicitly the same as objects that have
> static storage duration" mean?
>
> 2019年4月2日(火) 9:27 Jeremy O'Brien <neut...@fastmail.com>:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 11:33, Kyohei Kadota wrote:
> > > Hi, 9fans. I use 9legacy.
> > >
> > > About below program, I expected that flags field will initialize to
> > > zero but the value of flags was a garbage, ex, "f8f7".
> > > Is this expected?
> > >
> > > ```
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > >
> > > struct option {
> > >     int n;
> > >     char *s;
> > >     int flags;
> > > };
> > >
> > > int
> > > main(void)
> > > {
> > >     struct option opt = {1, "test"};
> > >     printf("%d %s %x\n", opt.n, opt.s, opt.flags);
> > >     return 0;
> > > }
> > > ```
> > >
> > >
> >
> > According to C99: "If an object that has automatic storage duration is
> not initialized explicitly, its value is indeterminate."
> >
> > Stack variable == automatic storage duration. This appears to be correct
> behavior to me.
> >
>
>

Reply via email to