i'm sorry, what? lack of TLS? go read 9front's tlssrv(8). it's been there for a while already.
-rodri On Sat, Jan 11, 2020, 11:32 AM Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> wrote: > > fyi i have been running a fossil/venti pair since 2004 and it has been > solid. > > what is too big - honest question. > > i thought the biggest issues are: > > performance - the elegance and generality sacrifice some performance, > though this is not a problem for me. > > lack of a tls fs interface - there is (imho) no excuse for a lack of tls > these days. > > no way for a user in (say) the ventidump group to request an immediate > dump - handy for checkpointing a code release, though justing copying the > release to a new dir is ok. > > no way to push a vac score into the /archive hierarchy - nice for > migrating in other backups. > > all these are fixable and on my todo list but none have happened. > > > On 10 Jan 2020, at 9:37 pm, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> The major fly in the ointment is the outdated sha1 hash function used > by venti > > > > major? fly? there's no problem with how sha1 is used by venti right now. > > > > a more substantial complaint would be that the venti/fossil system is > > way too big. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Ta5071137bc09d294-Mc069a15aa29b86932440eee2 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
