On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, at 3:39 PM, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote: > > Yep. I might be able to understand that change, but less so the later > > breaking change to 9p auth. > > What 9p change for auth are you talking about? > > The dp9ik implementation in 9front just uses p9any to negotiate > it and p9sk1 is still supported; tho by default we have p9sk1 > disabled at the authentication server now to prevent the offline > dictionary attack on the DES encrypted tickets that p9sk1 uses > (tho it can be enabled by a flag in the authservers startup script). > > The code changes to have both auth protocols work concurrently > was actually the thing that took the most work and it took > over a year of transition period until we could disable > p9sk1 by default. > > I'm not aware of anyone changing 9p.
I'm confused now. I'm sure someone official bypassed the existing mechanism to add a new auth protocol. I thought the existing mechanism was p9any, but perhaps I was wrong. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc472e4a0c0b6f084-Mdec75a41815793ccfe5cc9b4 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
