I'm sorry that my original terse reply, which was well meant, stirred up a hornet's nest. I simply didn't know that it wasn't to be found in the two distributions you mentioned (I did know it was certainly in 9front).
On Sun, 22 May 2022 at 19:18, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: > You enquired about support for an architecture within Plan 9 on a Plan 9 > list so the context was clear and I reply with the relevant architecture > string to help you locate it, but get a little lecture about Arm's naming > scheme (come to think of it, what are Thumb-1 and Thumb-2 called?). Next > time, I'll insist on the 27B/6. > > On Fri, 20 May 2022, 22:27 adr, <a...@sdf.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, 20 May 2022, Charles Forsyth wrote: >> >> > Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:34:05 +0100 >> > From: Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> >> > Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> >> > To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> >> > Subject: Re: [9fans] Aarch64 on labs|9legacy? >> > >> > It's called arm64 >> >> From >> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/Introduction?lang=en >> >> "AArch64 is the name used to describe the 64-bit execution state >> of the ARMv8 architecture. AArch32 describes the 32-bit execution >> state of the ARMv8 architecture, which is almost identical to ARMv7. >> GNU and Linux documentation (except for Redhat and Fedora distributions) >> sometimes refers to AArch64 as ARM64." >> >> I would agree that you could use the therm ARM64 as a synonym of >> Aarch64, but giving me just that response... It isn't even funny. >> >> adr. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T000c7f7d66260ba3-M8607f977bb2ac1eebf6e7a69 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
