zfs is very big, complicated and the code looks ancient. I did not enjoy
working with it.

On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 08:51, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:

> fixing another couple deadlocks makes you finally consider ditching fossil?
> zfs storage isn't always permanent either, for example if you use
> encryption or deduplication.
>
> On 4/6/23, Lucio De Re <lucio.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4/6/23, n...@pixelhero.dev <n...@pixelhero.dev> wrote:
> >> Quoth Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com>:
> >>> fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter
> >>> for
> >>> SSD let alone nvme
> >>
> >> I am once again asking you to be more specific, please :)
> >>
> >> I have Plans for improving venti for myself, it'd be great to actually
> >> have a specific list of issues that others have noticed!
> >>
> > I presume that fossil doesn't apply special treatment to SSD and NVME
> > which to my limited understand could be a serious downside. I guess
> > I'm asking whether one should seriously consider ditching the
> > fossil/venti combination and consider centralising permanent storage
> > on something like ZFS instead?
> >
> > Lucio.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T354fe702e1e9d5e9-M0d0a1ec97cd26b13e9294866
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to