> The absence of Fossil from 9front was the one I found most difficult to > overcome, but at least in theory only the equivalent of "fossil/conf" (an > rc script I eventually shoehorned from plan9port) is essential. I can see > how it would be inconvenient to need to support software that is > significantly complex, especially when it must also be able to be embedded > in the kernel.
Actually, adding fossil back in to 9front is extremely simple; I have a branch at https://git.sr.ht/~pixelherodev/plan9 which has fossil integrated. The talk I gave at IWP9 was running from fossil on my 9front branch. If my changes are too extensive compared to 9front (it's a personal branch, so I wouldn't blame you for thinking that), I'm happy to even create a branch that's just 9front+fossil. It's really not hard. - Noam Preil ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tde2ca2adda383a3a-Mf4487e7706a5d7b4363ebe2e Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
