On Tue, 10 May 2005, boyd, rounin wrote:
> > what was their choice? > > long == 64 bits > int == 32 bits > short == 16 bits > > i argued: > > long == 32 bits > int == 64 bits > short == 16 bits IIRC that is what SGI did, correct? ron
On Tue, 10 May 2005, boyd, rounin wrote:
> > what was their choice? > > long == 64 bits > int == 32 bits > short == 16 bits > > i argued: > > long == 32 bits > int == 64 bits > short == 16 bits IIRC that is what SGI did, correct? ron