> i had similar luck with greylisting, validatesender, etc and SPF.
We can't greylist, we'll be validating sender in about a month and
SPF will get done ASA I convince myself I know what it "means".
> now, if i could just do something about the rbl morons, i'd be happy,
DaveL puts his finger in his ear and says "Rud" backwards.
Charles,
I'm sure we'd all like to hear of a spam-protection system which isn't a
PITA to administer
and which actually delivers the message before the recipient dies of old
age:
greylisting is too slow for our business.
Sadly, in reality, I suspect that what we have here (spamassassin and
blacklists up the eyeballs)
is about as good as it gets:
evidence to the contrary gratefully received.
Our whitelist has about 6 entries on it for important business contacts
who use dodgy ISPs.
> but i doubt it. people that attempt reverse lookups and not SPF are a
close second.
Hysterical reasons for that, like SPF has only existed for <1year,
uses DNS and has badly publicised semantics
(otherwise I'd have jumped on it long ago).
Dave.
