Hello May be it is easy to make upas plumb the signatures and encription to other tool.
About the files, i think there are tools that will "compile" on the three environments and will crypt streams of bytes (cat | crypt > file.crypt ), i think that is the easier way :-? ( gnupg and those tools are really big, and if you only need to interact with yourself. . . or others with the same tool. . .) gabi On 3/28/06, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think a better route would be to build s/mime compatable signatures > and encryption into upas/fs and upas/marshal so applications without > a need to know would not have to know. > > - erik > > On Mon Mar 27 18:39:14 CST 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Fernan wrote: > > // I am trying to get some sort of encyption. Protability between p9, linux > > and > > // windows is a bit critical for my application ( I am paranoid ). > > > > pgp or gpg would be nice for portability, as well as for other things, > > like signing mail. in the mean time, inferno's 'idea' performs the > > IDEA encryption, which i believe is still considered quite strong. > > it's available natively on each platform inferno is (can someone > > confirm windows?), as well as within inferno itself. >
