> I think the root of the bias against rio is that it isn't "pretty". I > was joking when I talked about gradients and rounded corners, but I'm > willing to bet that if rio did have cute windows, anti-aliased fonts > and little whirry 3d doo dads that a lot of the complaints about it > would disappear.
But that is all computing time that could be better spent elsewhere. Who actually wants their machine to run no faster than a 4.7MHz IBM PC-Clone, albeit a very snazzy looking one? ++L
