[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hm, I submitted that patch after Andrey suggested it and I thought it
> had worked successfully for what it was intended (see previous mail
> about APE failures).  Perhaps it ought to have been tested more
> carefully and perhaps it was more pervasive than I thought.  It may be
> advisable to revert it.

Sorry, it seems like /sys/src/ape/lib/ap/plan9/kill.c is not the
problem.  I reverted it, then recompiled libap, then recompiled gs and
it still suicides.

At the moment I have no clue why gs got broken.  (Correct me if it
isn't considered broken).

Heiko

Reply via email to