On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:22:56PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > it's more in the spirit of oberon, or pascal which have > had more formally defined and machine independent > types. >
Indeed. This (_Bool) does seem to be a solution in search of a problem. Is there anyone (other than a few refugees from Pascal) who believes that C suffers from its lack of a formal boolean type? jcs
