On 10/8/07, Eric Van Hensbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/8/07, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >That being said however, any advantages we can get on the relatively > > >slow hardware should benefit the efficiency (if not the latency and > performance) of the faster > > > > i think there's quite a bit of scope for performance improvements > without doing violence > > to the overall structure or messing up the implementation. i hope some > things end up > > being smaller and cleaner. > > > > Agreed. Performance does not necessarily equal complexity. Neither > does allowing specialization -- I think specialization enables > simplification and clarity in many situations. > > -eric >
Looks like at&t's new tilt is running L4/Linux :-) Based on a qualcomm chipset I'd bet it's either Iguana based or something else. Buddy of mine posted this: http://paste.lisp.org/display/48981 Not so strangely, it's using the version of gcc I had to use to build pistachio on the G5 that Ron couldn't get going with whatever was on his Red Hat system :-) Dave
