>> you are stating truisms. you might as well add "how about poisoning >> your friends that you invited for dinner." at that point you're >> betraying an implicit trust. >> > > "Implicit trust" is a ridiculous thing to allow in a computer network > or host. > >> if you don't trust your users, you can create a temporary namespace to >> house a copy of system binaries and narrow the / for that user to >> his/her ns. >> > > So you're never going to 9fs a remote system and cd > /n/somebox/some/path? :-)
your comments seem contradictory to me. on the one hand you imply that there is trust - presumably to collaborate, hence the reason you'd want to import a foreign fs and be allowed to do so by the foreign fs owner to start - and then you say trust is ridiculous.
