On 11/1/07, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One could, of course, use a different protocol with > a 9P front end. That's okay for clients, but you'd still > have to teach the back-end server (i.e. fossil) to speak > the other protocol directly in order to get any guarantees. > (If 9P doesn't cut it then anything that's just in front of > (not in place of) a 9P server can't solve the problem.) >
Sorry, could you clarify what you mean by this?
-eric
