> > > Please note that I have said nothing at all about any alleged > > > objective philosophical truth of my position. I have placed the word > > > "correct" in quotes to point out that I am using it somewhat glibly. > > > Your use of quotation marks does not effectively communicate what you > > think it does. > > Not to you, but your track record indicates that you have no desire > whatsoever to ever understand anything I will ever say.
To disagree with you is not necessarily to misunderstand you. > To me, that is. Subjectively, to me, that is exactly how it appears, > in all honesty. That sucks, and it makes me think you suck. I'm glad that you admitted an opinion. Somehow it's not as bad, a person holding a bad opinion of me than holding a bad objective fact about me. > Not > using that as an argument for anything, just pointing it out to you in > case you might want to correct it. Correct your opinion? Or correct my behavior so that I conform to your opinion of a person who doesn't suck? And where did I miss the coin toss that said one of these two people should change in order to live up to the other person's opinion of morality or civility or whatever? Maybe you should be the one correcting yourself so that I won't think badly of you. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A Civil Religious Debate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
