On Feb 16, 4:19 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > lol ... i bet you failed sandbox, didnt you joe? > > you have no way of authenticating the truth of the bible, the saints, > or anything written about god ... admit it, and move on ... >
You don't know what I can do. You've never asked. > On Feb 16, 2:49 pm, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 16, 7:09 am, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > please dont tell me what to talk about joe ... > > > Please don't tell me what to tell you, e. > > > >your stripes are showing again ...since, you dont "know" the full truth > > >behind the > > > church, why do you talk about it? ... > > > Why do you assert that I don't know the full truth behind the Church? > > > >the "truth" you promote is a > > > collection of beliefs, why not admit it? > > > You do not know enough about the Church to say what she is. I do. > > It's that simple. > > > In particular, your statement, > > > "the "authentic face of Catholicism" is actually a conglomeration of > > the writings of men, selected by a roman emperor from a ream of > > writings, most of which were discarded ... > > " > > > is patently false. > > > If you don't want me to point out that you are making false > > statements, I suggest you stop making them. If you don't want me to > > point out when you are going beyond anything you know about, I suggest > > you stick to what you know. This is not rocket science. > > > > On Feb 15, 8:38 pm, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 15, 8:20 pm, e_space <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > the "authentic face of Catholicism" is actually > > > > > <snip> > > > > > found in the Saints, as I said. > > > > > Stick to talking about what you know.
