Hi Jonathan,
I think the short answer is: We are confident that these tables are
efficient enough to show that A5/1 is insecure.
We will still continue to improve the approach to create insights into
how TMTOs can be optimized.
Our lookup software supports different table layouts in parallel, so
none of the data we computed is lost even when newer tables are more
efficient.
Cheers,
-Karsten
On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> after the increase in efficiency,
> are the ccc tables still "efficient"?
> I have been seeding as fast as I can (with a 2TB traffic per month)
> but I don't want to continue seeding something NOT EFFICIENT.
>
> Please advise.
>
> Jonathan A
> _______________________________________________
> A51 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
_______________________________________________
A51 mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
