this is not true. the 260 is about as fast as the c1060. you only buy a tesla because of the bigger RAM (irrelevant for brute forcers), better drivers (irrelevant), somehow higher quality chips and more testing done (largely irrelevant to bruteforcing). for the a5/1 table generation an error rate of 1% is bearable, and i have not seen my *overclocked* gtx260 make a mistake in the last year during numerous debug sessions.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:57:12PM +0100, Jakub wrote: > I write about this because brute force password breaking > for rar archives and pgp encrypted files with recovery > software when c1060 is used is about 8-10 time faster then > using gtx260, and sometimes on Ebay is pssible to buy it > for 1000-1200USD > > > Dnia 22-01-2010 o godz. 15:25 Mark Janssen napisał(a): > > 2010/1/22 Jakub <[email protected]>: > > > Is it possible to use Nvidia Tesla C1060 device for computation tables ? > > > > Since it has CUDA support, yes. I doubt it would be more > > cost-efficient than simply using graphics cards, though. Within the > > prices I found you could buy at least 10 regular high-end cards. > > -- > Pozdrawiam > jakub, [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > A51 mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51 _______________________________________________ A51 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lists.reflextor.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a51
