On Wed 11 Jul 2001 at 10:38AM -0400, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> When I
> found that abc2ps and its relatives (abcm2ps is probably the
> best-maintained at the moment) weren't suitable for my purposes, I
> started converting my abc files to lilypond, and publishing them that
> way.
>
Frank seems to share this view.
I'd be interested to know what makes lilypond so much better than the
abc2ps clones. Is it some killer feature or just an accumulation of
little features that lilypond does or does better ?
James Allwright
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
