On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > << Thus [Ace]4 could be > > used for [A4c4e4]. >>
> Heavy ABC User* cries plaintively: > Could we at least get this one in and worry about the "chords containing > different note lengths" (can't recall when I've run across this) at some > other time? I've added the following to the upcomming revision of the draft standard. Please let me know if it is acceptable. << All the notes within a chord should have the same length. More complicated chords can be transcribed with the & operator, see section Voice overlay. The chord forms a syntactic grouping, to which the same prefixes and postfixes can be attached as to an ordinary note, except for accidentals. In particular, the following notation is legal: ( "^I".[CEG]- > [CEG] "^IV" [F=AC]3/2"^V"[GBD]/ H[CEG]2 ) When both inside and outside the chord length modifiers are used, they should be multiplied. I.e. [C2E2G2]3 has the same meaning as [CEG]6. >> Groeten, Irwin Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~* Chazzanut Online: http://www.joods.nl/~chazzanut/ To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
